Voter ID Won’t Prevent Fraud, but Will Prevent Votes

by on February 9, 2012

Post image for Voter ID Won’t Prevent Fraud, but Will Prevent Votes

Across the country, legislators (mostly Republicans) are pushing for so-called “voter ID” laws that would require every voter to present a photo ID before casting his or her vote. This requirement is ostensibly meant to reduce voting fraud. In fact, it would do no such thing.


Nearly all reports of voter fraud turn out to be clerical errors. For example, lawyers for both candidates in the 2008 presidential election looked for examples of voter fraud, but were not able to find any. The only fraud that a photo ID requirement might prevent would be voter impersonation—a non-eligible voter impersonating an eligible voter at the polls. This has apparently never happened. Why would it? It is hard to do, and the payoff is practically non-existent. In 2009, Adam Skaggs of the Brennan Center testified to the Texas legislature that there are “virtually no confirmed examples of impersonation fraud.”

That’s enough of a reason not to increase the cost of holding elections, but the effect of an ID requirement is important to consider.

According to the Minnesota League of Women Voters, a substantial proportion of the electorate does not have a government-issued photo ID:

  • 18% of elderly citizens
  • 15% of voters earning less than $35,000 a year
  • 18% of citizens aged 18-24 do not have a government-issued ID with their current name and address
  • 10% of voters with disabilities
  • 25% of African-American citizens of voting age

In other words, a lot of poor people, college students, minorities, and people who rely on public benefits. Some of these people would have a hard time getting a photo ID because they don’t have access to their birth certificate or other identifying information. They also tend to support Democrats. Maybe voter ID requirements really aren’t about voter fraud after all (especially since the specter of voter fraud is itself a fraud), but about disenfranchising broad swathes of likely Democratic voters? Seems suspiciously likely.

Voter ID laws are a solution in search of a problem. Oppose them at the polls, and tell your representatives you oppose efforts to make it harder to vote.

(photo: http://www.flickr.com/photos/cle0patra/3040705918/)

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

dave March 31, 2012 at 7:20 pm

total and complete BS ! most poor people smoke buy alcholol go the casino so they have to have a identification.

I have a hard time believing that 15% of people making less than 35 K dont have a proper ID.

I support voter ID law because it makes sense. If you dont have a proper ID you should not be able to vote

Reply

Sam Glover March 31, 2012 at 9:46 pm

That makes no sense at all. Making it harder to vote when there is absolutely no justification for making it harder (i.e., fraud) is nonsensical.

Reply

Leave a Comment

If you want us to post your comment, make it coherent, relevant, and respectful.

Posting information about your legal problem or lawsuit on a public website—especially this public website—is a BAD IDEA. Here's why.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Previous post:

Next post: