T-Mobile early-termination fee lawsuit moves forward because mandatory binding arbitration clause unconscionable

by Sam Glover on October 11, 2007

atttelephone-large.jpg

Following on this post, Wired reports that T-Mobile failed in its efforts to compel the plaintiff to participate in binding arbitration rather than litigate his claims as a class action in court.

Mandatory binding arbitration in cases like this is cheaper for corporations and prohibitively expensive for consumers, especially when the damages at stake are so low. California’s decision is a hopeful one for consumers in this case as well as in other cases where corporations use mandatory binding arbitration to attempt to avoid responsibility to the public at large for unfair policies.

[via Consumerist]

If you are in Minnesota, contact The Glover Law Firm, LLC, for a free case evaluation. In any other state, you can find a consumer rights lawyer using the National Association of Consumer Advocates lawyer database.

Leave a Comment

When you post a comment on this blog, you grant us the right to modify or delete your comment, but we have no duty to do so. If you want us to post your comment, make it coherent, relevant, and respectful.

Previous post:

Next post: