Debt collectors filed more than 36,000 lawsuits in Minnesota in 2007

1default0223.jpg

According to the Strib, debt collection lawsuits and default judgment filings are skyrocketing, and went up to more than 36,000 for 2007.

36,000!!! For crying out loud. That’s 3,000 per month! And those are just the lawsuits that actually get filed.

[via Consumer Rights Watch]

[photo: Star Tribune]

AFFIL: End predatory lending now and save the American dream.

Related: No related posts
| | Trackback
Tags: , , ,
Filed under: Consumer Lawsuits

6 Comments on “Debt collectors filed more than 36,000 lawsuits in Minnesota in 2007”

1
John on May 12th, 2008, 6:36 pm  

I am an attorney in NJ. I recently have been asked by a friend to look at a summons he received. In a nutshell, he bought a tractor trailer in 07, the driver quit, he sold it to someone (in NJ) that financed it through the same company, and that company required him to be a guarantor for the buyer.

The buyer has declared bankruptcy, but is still making some kind of payment with this company.

He received a summons (from Minnesota) stating he is being sued for the entire amount. I called the court, and was told a suit hasn’t been filed. I then called the lawyer and he informed me that they were just serving him, and weren’t going to file now. He mentioned pocket service. I told him the summons was false as he stated that all of the actions of the underlying suit took place in Minn. Neither person was ever in Minn, just sent the paperwork there.

Anyway, I’ve looked up pocket service and it mentions pre judgment garnishment, and default judgment, but nowhere states actually filing the suit. Is this correct that merely serving summons on the defendant and not filing requires the summons to be answered?

It seems that what I have read is missing some steps, but I have been wrong before.

THanks for your help.

2
Sam Glover on May 13th, 2008, 7:02 am  

See this post. No, the summons and complaint do not need to be filed. If a defendant who is served does not answer, the defendant will lose, and the collection firm can start collecting on the judgment.

3

[...] it is so cheap and easy, there is a lot of suing going on. Debt collectors filed 36,000 default judgments last year. Only the collectors know how many other lawsuits they started but did not file because they came [...]

4

[...] joins California and Minnesota in the news, as its civil courts try to deal with moving more than 119,000 debt collection lawsuits [...]

5
John Souza on August 27th, 2008, 5:35 pm  

Is there a way to contest a judgment in MN? One was filed by a contractor and I didn’t know about any hearing on it. It was for a disputed bill that I’d written to get documentation on. Instead I got slapped with a judgment for the entire amount plus fees.

6
Sam Glover on August 27th, 2008, 6:15 pm  

Of course. You can always file a motion to vacate a judgment. Whether or not you can succeed will depend on the circumstances.

Note that there is no hearing in civil cases, unless someone files a motion for something or the case is in conciliation court. You must respond by serving an answer, a written response to the complaint.

If you received a summons and complaint, it tells you that in the first sentence of the summons.

Leave a comment

When you post a comment on this blog, you grant us the right to modify or delete your comment, but we have no duty to do so.